Readings of historical ciphers

Cipher letters from European archives of 1503 to 1653, read or rebuilt in October 2026. Each page below shows one result in a form that you can check by hand: the key, a few lines of cipher, and the decoding token by token.

PageDocumentWhat is newState
oxford-1646An intercepted letter to King Charles I from besieged Oxford, 13 May 1646 (British Library, Add MS 72438, f. 10)The first connected reading (an earlier partial reading by A. Aymeloglu had about 45 code values). The key is rebuilt from the printed Titus cipher of 1648, with a shift.89 % of the tokens read; the transcription is A. Aymeloglu's, and we did not see the manuscript
cocquet-1616Coquet to Mangot, Rome, 13 November 1616 (BnF, Clairambault 369, ff. 316-317)First reading. Solved from context, then confirmed by the period key sheet (BnF fr. 18009, f. 156).All cipher passages read
espagnol-318The viceroy of Sicily to King Ferdinand, Messina, 27 April 1503 (BnF, Espagnol 318, no. 94)First reading. The key is rebuilt from the letter itself.Read in large part; 64 code words have no value
espagnol-318-no93The Spanish ambassador at Venice to Ferdinand and Isabella, 24 February 1504 (BnF, Espagnol 318, no. 93)First reading known to us. The key is rebuilt from the letter itself. We found no period decipherment (the searches are listed).91 % of the tokens have a firm value, 97 % with the probable values; 8 code words have no value
dutch-1653The Dutch deputies in England to Boreel, 1 September 1653 (Thurloe, State Papers, i.435)The key, and the link to the printed Dutch minute. The text itself is reproduced.127 of 131 groups fit
espagnol-132Three letters of Antonio Pérez, one page of Philip II, and a memorial of the Duke of Savoy (BnF, Espagnol 132)First readings with keys that others published.Five pieces read
gonzaga-1590Cardinal Scipione Gonzaga to the Duke of Nevers, 1586 to 1590 (BnF, fr. 4698, fr. 4702 and fr. 4696)The cipher rebuilt with no key sheet; three period decipherments linked to their cipher letters; the rebuilt code tested on a second volume (97.6 % of 463 words right); letters and passages with no decipherment read, and checked against Pastor's history.A code of 448 values; the new readings have gaps
nevers-1593The Duke of Nevers to the Oratorian Tommaso Bozio in Rome, minute of 1 May 1593, in Italian (BnF, fr. 4700, no. 38, f. 72r)The first reading known to us of the two cipher passages. G. Cassiani described the minute in 2014 and gave no reading of them. The key is rebuilt from the text.148 of 149 groups have a value; the first words of the first passage are not sure
badalocchio-1593Three cipher letters of Vincenzo Badalocchio, agent in Rome of the Duke of Nevers, of 5 and 11 December 1592 and 9(?) January 1593, in Italian (BnF, fr. 4700, ff. 85r, 65r and 80r)The first readings known to us. One key reads the three letters: the letters of the Duke's minute (nevers-1593) and two tables of words in the order of the alphabet. No key sheet of this cipher is known to us. Corrected on 11 October 2026: the first page had the figure 2 as a null, and one sentence without its "non".Read, with gaps: f. 85r, 361 of the 383 cipher groups that carry text (94 %, a hand count); f. 65r, two short runs; f. 80r, about nine tenths (717 of 778 groups by the hand count, 708 to 711 by the strict count). No name is read from the cipher

A tenth result, read for the greater part: centurione-1528, the "Venetian?" cipher with superscript digits of 1528 (BnF fr. 3022, no. 20, and the letters signed "Hieronimo Ranzo"). 86 % of the text reads as connected sense. The page shows the build of the cipher and worked lines. The key table, the read stretches, the blind test and the blind audit are in the folder centurione-1528. To check it by hand: the last line of the second "Ranzo" letter (BnF fr. 2988, Gallica view 20) has the groups m176, c193, v152, o66 with small numbers between them; they read "mille cinquecento vinti octo".

How the work was done

The work was done by a model (Claude, by Anthropic, running as Claude Code with subagents), directed by Paolo Rosson. No palaeographer or historian has checked it yet.

Most cipher lines had two transcription passes, the second one blind. Each reading has a control: a wrong-key or shuffled-key score, period glosses, or an outside source that was not used as a crib. Each page gives the numbers and the limits, and it says what is new, what is only reproduced from a period source, and what stays open.

Two earlier results

Six of these documents are on S. Tomokiyo's list of unsolved historical ciphers: the letter to Charles I, Cocquet's cipher, the Dutch ciphers of 1653, the two Spanish letters of 1503 and 1504, and the cipher with superscript digits of 1528. All files are in the repository pangoleen/cipher-readings.